• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ABRADER 5.5 EP-1 DSPL BLADE; SAW, POWERED, AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ABRADER 5.5 EP-1 DSPL BLADE; SAW, POWERED, AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number 7205325
Medical Device Problem Code Flaked (1246)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Information (3190)
Date of Event 07/27/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during hip arthroscopy procedure, the blade was showing metal debris in the joint when it is used and rubbing on the inside shaft of the blade.It is unknown if there was a delay and how the procedure was completed.No other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
One 7205325 disposable 5.5mm ep-1 abrader blade used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Due to product unavailability, evaluation was limited, but photos showed rotational wear band damage.This is caused by excessive side-loading and is a source of debris.This confirms excess side loading was a factor during attempted use.If further information, becomes available, the complaint may be revisited.Factors that may affect device performance include: device ability, surgical ability, procedure location and tissue condition.Influences that could compromise product performance or integrity that are unrelated to manufacture include: 1) incompatible force or torque or leverage applied.2) insufficient irrigation or engaging the device without suction.3) seizing of blades due to inadequate bio matter excision.4) blade hand piece not fully loaded and or locked into mdu hand set.5) change of approach during use.Per ifu 1060595: ¿excessive ¿side-loading¿ on the blade during use does not improve cutting performance and in extreme cases may result in wear and degradation of the inner assembly.Make sure the hand piece is off while changing blade tip position.Periodic irrigation of the blade is recommended to provide adequate cooling of the blade and to prevent accumulation of excised materials in the surgical site.Ensure that suction of 128 mmhg minimum is flowing while the instrument is running.Irreversible damage to blades or burrs will result if they are run without the flow of irrigation (dry).¿ complaint history review indicated similar allegations for the lot number reported.Batch review did not indicate a condition, product or procedure failure that supported the allegation.Instructions for use (ifu) contains recommendations and precautionary statements for proper use of product.Risk management files contain the reported failure.Product met specifications upon release to distribution.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).The reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.An analysis of the customer provided images showed rotational wear band damage.A visual inspection revealed that the suspected device was free of debris, so there were not visible metal shavings on the blade inner or outer blades.Both heat shrink tubes were present on the inner blade.At the proximal end of the inner blade, the surface finish of the metal appeared to be scratched off and flaking.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of the part drawing found that the surface roughness was specified.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A review of the instructions for use found the following warnings: excessive ¿side-loading¿ on the blade during use does not improve cutting performance and in extreme cases may result in wear and degradation of the inner assembly.Make sure the hand piece is off while changing blade tip position.Periodic irrigation of the blade is recommended to provide adequate cooling of the blade and to prevent accumulation of excised materials in the surgical site.Ensure that suction of 128 mmhg minimum is flowing while the instrument is running.Irreversible damage to blades or burrs will result if they are run without the flow of irrigation (dry).The complaint was confirmed.Potential factors include unintentional side-loading, lack of irrigation, and inadvertent accumulation of excised materials within the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ABRADER 5.5 EP-1 DSPL BLADE
Common Device Name
SAW, POWERED, AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
MDR Report Key10423582
Report Number1219602-2020-01267
Device Sequence Number2949031
Product Code HAB
UDI-Device Identifier03596010251534
UDI-Public03596010251534
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryNZ
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/08/2024
Device Model Number7205325
Device Catalogue Number7205325
Device Lot Number50832010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/24/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/27/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/07/2020
04/09/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/18/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/09/2020
04/13/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
-
-