|
Reporter is a synthes employee.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 the patient underwent the surgery with the screws and the screwdriver.During the surgery, the surgeon couldn¿t hold the screw with the screwdriver, and he couldn¿t insert the screw.Eventually, the surgeon couldn't insert the screw completely.The surgery was completed with less than 30 minutes delay.After the surgery, when the surgeon tried to hold other screws with the same screwdriver, he could hold them without any problem.This report is for one (1) matrixmidface screwdriver bld w/sprg hldg slv shrt/79mm hxc.This is report 1 of 4 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6 investigation summary visual inspection: the device received in hägendorf site ¿scrdriver shaft matmidf med w/hold-sleev¿ 03.503.205 with lot number 7571942 is in proper conditions.No scratches or signs of heavy use or damage are present on the device.Functional test: functional tests were performed on the device (¿scrdriver shaft matmidf med w/hold-sleev¿ 03.503.205 with lot number 7571942) according to inspection sheet the following functional tests were performed: ¿ self-holding of the spring on the shaft: the device passed the test performed; ¿ manual test on the continuity and locking in the recess.The device passed the test performed; ¿ functional test: safe pick up of the screws using gauges.Since the device analyzed passed all the test performed, the complaint could not be replicated.The screwdriver is properly able to hold the screw.Dimensional inspection: not required per selected investigation flow document/specification review: the following documents were reviewed: ¿ device history record (dhr) ¿ inspection sheet, ¿pa intern multiple 03.503.205/206/-us ¿; ¿ drawing, ¿cruciform screwdriver blade,w/spring¿; ¿ drawing, ¿holding sleeve, short¿.Even if not required per selected investigation flow, in order to perform the investigation, all the documents mentioned above, valid when the device was manufactured, have been analyzed.Summary: according to evidence is not possible to address the final root cause to a manufacturing issue.The manufacturing process was performed according to the reviewed documents and all the functional tests were recorded.Most likely a mishandling of the device could have led to the opening of this complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history part: 03.503.205 lot: 7571942 manufacturing site: hägendorf release to warehouse date: 12 sep 2011 a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.H11 corrected data d10 device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|