A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported that a burning smell was coming from a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine during heat disinfect.The biomed traced the burning smell to burn marks on a cable that connects to the bibag assembly board.There was also melting found on a ¿little part of the connector that goes to the bibag assembly board¿, and charring on the bibag assembly board.In addition to the thermal damage, the biomed stated there was a fluid leak coming from the machine¿s fluid sample port.The fluid leak was reportedly caused by a crack in the sample port connector.There were no reports of smoke, sparks, or flames.No damage was identified on any other components.The machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet, and there was no previous history of the machine failing the electrical leakage test.The biomed stated there were 624 hours on the machine at the time of the event.The cracked connector was replaced, and the damaged part was discarded.The bibag assembly was replaced as well.The damaged bibag assembly was returned to the manufacturer via the returned goods authorization (rga) process.At the time of follow up, the machine had been returned to service and was fully operational.There was no patient involvement associated with the reported event.
|
Plant investigation: although it was stated that the complaint device was available to be returned, to date no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.Should the sample be returned at a later date, a supplemental report will be submitted capturing the updated investigation results.
|