| Catalog Number |
0117310 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
06/22/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax light mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax light mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with symptomatic left inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax light mesh.Per operative notes, ¿hernia sac was identified and reduced.A 3dmax light mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia and right inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with implant of synthetic meshes.Per operative notes, ¿recurrent indirect left inguinal hernia and indirect right inguinal hernia was noted.In left side, the previously placed mesh was retracted into indirect defect and dense adhesions were removed.A synthetic mesh was placed and in the left side and another synthetic mesh was placed in right side overlapping to left sided mesh tacked and sutured.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|