• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SURMODICS TELEMARK MICROCATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SURMODICS TELEMARK MICROCATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number SURMC135
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 08/12/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Physician applied appropriate/ moderate pressure with torqueing the telemark to advance the catheter across the calcified lesion, but it would not advance.He then removed the telemark catheter and observed angiographically that the radiopaque marker was detached and located in the mid circumflex.He attempted to remove the marker band but was unsuccessful.He was able to deliver a turnpike lp microcatheter just pass the lesion and exchange for a rotoblator wire.The physician then used the rotoblator for the vessel proximal to the lesion and detached marker band successfully.He then placed a guide wire subintimal and used a bsc stingray re-entry device to guide the coronary wire back into the true lumen pass the detached marker band and introduced a xience sierra coronary stent across the lesion and detached marker band and deployed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the batch history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported event appears to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.It was reported that the procedure was performed in a severely calcified lesion.The ifu states the contraindication: do not use the microcatheter in advanced calcified lesions and a warning to not manipulate the device if any resistance is felt.The investigation determined the reported complaint was related to device misuse.The field reps and staff were retrained on the device use.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TELEMARK MICROCATHETER
Type of Device
MICROCATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SURMODICS
9924 w 74th st
eden prairie, mn
Manufacturer (Section G)
CREAGH MEDICAL LTD.
ida business park
ballinasloe, galway H53 K 8P4
EI   H53 K8P4
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan canavan
ida business park
ballinasloe, galway H53 K-8P4
EI   H53 K8P4
MDR Report Key10448174
MDR Text Key205018798
Report Number3005994106-2020-00088
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEI
PMA/PMN Number
K173560
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSURMC135
Device Lot Number21903427
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/14/2020
Initial Date FDA Received08/25/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/14/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-