• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ROCHE 9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ROCHE 9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number ISE 9180
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/03/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).Phone number was provided as (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The initial reporter stated they received discrepant results for one patient sample tested for calcium ion on the roche 9180 electrolyte analyzer.The analyzer is used to test samples from pre-dialysis and post-dialysis blood patients.The pre-dialysis samples perform well on the analyzer, but post dialysis samples have been showing lower values on the instrument.The patient sample resulted with a calcium ion value of 0.64 mg/dl on the complained 9180 system.The sample was repeated on a second 9180 analyzer, resulting with a value of 2.49 mg/dl.The 2.49 mg/dl value was considered to be correct.The calcium ion electrode was replaced and preventive maintenance was performed on the analyzer.The sample was repeated after these actions and resulted with a calcium ion value of 0.27 mg/dl.The sample was repeated on the second 9180 analyzer, resulting with a value of 2.47 mg/dl.The low values were not considered compatible with post-dialysis results.The lot number and expiration date of the calcium ion electrode was requested, but not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The calcium electrode that was in use during the time of the event was installed in march 2020, but had an install before date of (b)(6) 2018, therefore it was installed more than one year after the install before date.The customer inserted the electrodes from one instrument to the other, however the same values were released in each instrument, which suggested an interference only in one instrument.Moreover, these discrepancies are observed only for post-dialysis samples.Instrument serial number (b)(6) was assembled and released in 2006 and therefore it cannot be excluded that some corrosion could have built over the time near the electrode contact points.The temperature set for both instruments was checked and it was noticed there was a small difference between them.All electrodes were replaced and the temperature was adjusted for instrument serial number (b)(6).The instrument performed ok after these actions.An interference only in instrument serial number (b)(6) could be explained by a different unit configuration applied on serial number (b)(6) the calcium result of 0.64 mmol/l (2.56 mg/dl) would reflect the same value obtained on the second 9180 analyzer.The most likely root cause for the issue is a different unit configuration for the calcium parameter on the analyzers or the service code activation on one analyzer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROCHE 9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER
Type of Device
ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
MDR Report Key10449857
MDR Text Key204427832
Report Number1823260-2020-02099
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JFP
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K961458
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/01/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberISE 9180
Device Catalogue Number03157334001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/04/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-