| Catalog Number |
4403 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
07/30/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair procedure, the bone anchor broke.The piece was not removed from the patient.Backup device was available to complete the procedure.No significant delay and no patient injuries were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.An analysis of the customer provided image found one of the tines on the inserter have been broken.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of the instructions for use found excessive force applied during tendon anchor deployment may result in damage to the tissue, to the material being fixated, to the anchor, or to the tendon anchor inserter.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.Clinical evaluation found that no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medwatch report number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair procedure, the bone anchor broke.The piece was looked for in the surgical site and thoroughly irrigated.Risk of going into the patient to remove far outweighed the benefits.Backup device was available to complete the procedure.No significant delay and no patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|