|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the first complaint reported for this product/lot number combination.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.However, the dhr was requested to view manufacturing records.Based upon the severity level and lot quantity, the number of events is within the acceptable quality levels investigation summary: two hemo split long-term catheter kits were returned for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed on the returned kits.The first kit was returned in package opened condition.It included two adhesive dressings, two endcaps, one introducer needle, one guide-wire in a guide-wire hoop, one tunneler, one 8f dilator and one 12f dualator dilator.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the component missing issue as the first sample was returned opened and the original state of the package at the time of opening could not be confirmed.The second kit was received in package sealed condition and upon visual evaluation the peel-apart sheath was found missing in the kit.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported missing peel-apart sheath.Complaint due to ¿missing peelable sheath¿ was confirmed.According with the photo evaluation performed at reynosa facility and gross visual evaluation performed, the following was concluded: the peel-apart sheath was found to be missing.The state of the sample labeled as number 2 revealed that the peel-apart sheath was not placed in the kit tray during the packaging process.Therefore, the cause of this condition is manufacturing related.Labeling review:a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b7,d4 (expiration date: 08/2020),g4.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|