|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that during the compression of a spine segment on (b)(6) 2020, the locking screws on the expedium compression forceps loosened which resulted in the instrument becoming unusable.The compression could be carried out by using an alternative compression forceps.Procedure was successfully completed with no delay.There was no patient consequence.This report is for an expedium compressor, parallel.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: a product investigation was conducted: visual inspection: the xpdm compressor, parallel (p/n: 279702070, lot #: km824064) was returned and received at us cq.Upon visual inspection, the left tip of the device was missing a component of the scr, shdr fem srt.Discoloration was observed on the device but have no impact on the device functionality.No other issues were identified with the returned device.Device failure/defect identified? yes.Dimensional inspection: there was conclusive evidence that the device was missing a component and no other issues were identified with the returned device, so dimensional inspection was not performed.Document/specification review: based on the date of manufacture, the current and manufactured revision of drawings were reviewed.Complaint confirmed? yes, the device received was missing a component.Hence confirming the allegation.Investigation conclusion: the complaint condition was confirmed for the xpdm compressor, parallel (p/n: 279702070, lot #: km824064).There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.The potential cause could be due to device maintenance.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for xpdm compressor, parallel was conducted identifying that lot number km824064 was released in a single batch.Batch1: lot qty of 30 units were released on oct 23, 2015 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device history review: the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|