|
Attorney alleges that on or about (b)(6) 2014, the patient was implanted with a non-bard davol mesh to repair an umbilical hernia.On or about (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent an additional surgery; a bard/davol ventralight st w/echo positioning system was implanted in an attempt to repair the recurrent ventral hernia defect.Upon entering the abdomen, the surgeon noted there was a recurrent hernia defect with incarcerated omentum.Adhesions were taken down.On or about (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent surgery to remove the infected mesh and a bard/davol phasix was implanted in an attempt to repair the recurrent ventral hernias.Upon entering the abdomen, the surgeon noted the presence of a complex partial bowel obstruction.The mesh had become matted to the small bowel and omentum.Extensive adhesions were lysed and the complex partial small bowel obstruction was released.The infected mesh was removed.It is alleged that the mesh products caused serious injury and had to be removed via invasive surgery.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced and/or continues to experience pain, inflammation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, chills, loss of appetite, severe pain and suffering, which have impaired plaintiff¿s activities of daily living.It also alleged that the patient is at a higher risk of severe complications during an abdominal surgery, to the extent that future abdominal operations might not be feasible.Attorney also alleges past, present, and future damages, physical disability, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.It is further alleged that the patient experienced mental anguish, emotional distress and also that the device was defective.
|