MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH SIZE 8 ACCOLADE II 132 DEG; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

Model Number	6720-0837
Medical Device Problem Code	Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Injury (2348); Joint Laxity (4526)
Date of Event	02/13/2020
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Procedure: the patient underwent right total hip arthroplasty (b)(6) 2020.Patient underwent revision right total hip for instability on (b)(6) 2020.Head, liner and stem exchanged.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding revision involving an accolade stem was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated that : one month after index tha the patient underwent revision surgery for instability.It is unclear why the stem needed to be exchanged.On the post revision xray there is a circlage wire, it is not known if this was for prophylaxis against, or treatment for , calcar fracture.Further clarification from the clinician noted," dislocation of a right pressfit tha is confirmed by pre-operative x-rays.Without further confirmatory information such as an operative report and implant sheet it is not possible to be certain that the stem was revised.The stem has the same appearance and is in the same position as the pre-operative stem.However, post revision x-rays show the presence of a cerclage wire around the proximal femur.This wire would have been placed for one of two reasons.1.For prophylaxis against fracture when attempting to remove the stem or when inserting a new stem.2.A fracture did occur in the process of removal or insertion of a stem.That being stated without the documentation noted above revision of the stem can not be confirmed." device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient was revised due to instability.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated that : one month after index tha the patient underwent revision surgery for instability.It is unclear why the stem needed to be exchanged.On the post revision xray there is a circlage wire, it is not known if this was for prophylaxis against, or treatment for , calcar fracture.Further clarification from the clinician noted that dislocation of a right pressfit tha is confirmed by pre-operative x-rays.Without further confirmatory information such as an operative report and implant sheet it is not possible to be certain that the stem was revised.The stem has the same appearance and is in the same position as the pre-operative stem.However, post revision x-rays show the presence of a cerclage wire around the proximal femur.This wire would have been placed for one of two reasons.1.For prophylaxis against fracture when attempting to remove the stem or when inserting a new stem.2.A fracture did occur in the process of removal or insertion of a stem.That being stated without the documentation noted above revision of the stem can not be confirmed.The event could not be confirmed nor the exact cause be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.H3 other text : device not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Procedure: the patient underwent right total hip arthroplasty (b)(6) 2020.Patient underwent revision right total hip for instability on (b)(6) 2020.Head, liner and stem exchanged.

• Brand Name: SIZE 8 ACCOLADE II 132 DEG
• Common Device Name: PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
• Manufacturer (Section D): STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH; 325 corporate drive; mahwah NJ 07430
• MDR Report Key: 10458126
• Report Number: 0002249697-2020-01745
• Device Sequence Number: 14168710
• Product Code: LPH
• UDI-Device Identifier: 04546540664518
• UDI-Public: 04546540664518
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: PA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K143085
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2020
• Device Explanted Year: 2020
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: health professional
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 01/07/2021

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 09/30/2024
• Device Model Number: 6720-0837
• Device Catalogue Number: 6720-0837
• Device Lot Number: 60145302
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/03/2020
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 12/22/2020
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 08/27/2020
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 01/07/2021
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Hospitalization; Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 48 YR
• Patient Weight: 95