|
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC BLADE GUIDE SLEEVE FOR TROCHANTERIC FIXATION NAILS; GUIDE, SURGICAL, INSTRUMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
357.369 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date that the compression nut (357.69) is jammed on the sleeve (357.371).Concomitant devices: unknown nail (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity 1), unknown aiming arm (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity 1).This report is for 1 blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nails.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6 - update: the compression nut (357.69) is jammed on the sleeve (357.371).Concomitant device reported: unknown nail (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity 1), unknown aiming arm (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity 1).This complaint involves two (2) devices.Investigation flow: visual/ device interaction/ damage.Visual inspection: guide sleeve f/helical blade f/tfn (part# 357.369, lot# 79041, qty# 1) was returned received at us cq.Upon visual inspection at cq, it is observed that the buttress compression nut was stuck on the device.The external threads of the device got stripped.Few scratches and nicked spots were observed all over the body of the device.Epoxy marking (yellow) on the device got peeled off.Device failure/ defect was identified.Functional inspection: functional inspection of the device was not performed at cq due to the received stuck condition.But the stripped external threads of the device might have contributed to the complaint condition.The complaint was replicated with the returned device.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection of the device was not performed as the damage was conclusive during visual inspection.Document/ specification review: the following drawings were reviewed during the investigation: blade guide sleeve, tfn: 357_369 rev.F and rev.J no design issues or discrepancies were noted during the investigation.Complaint was confirmed.Investigation conclusion: the complaint is being confirmed for guide sleeve f/helical blade f/tfn (part# 357.369, lot# 79041) as the device was stuck with mating buttress compression nut.The stripped external threads of the device might have contributed to the unable to disassemble condition.No product design or manufacturing issues were identified, and no new malfunctions were identified either.Based upon these results, no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.H11: d4/lot number: device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Guide sleeve f/helical blade f/tfn (part# 357.369, lot# 79041, qty# 1) was returned received at us cq.Upon visual inspection at cq, it is observed that the buttress compression nut was stuck on the device.The external threads of the device got stripped.Few scratches and nicked spots were observed all over the body of the device.Epoxy marking (yellow) on the device got peeled off.The complaint is being confirmed for guide sleeve f/helical blade f/tfn (part# 357.369, lot# 79041) as the device was stuck with mating buttress compression nut.The stripped external threads of the device might have contributed to the unable to disassemble condition.No product design or manufacturing issues were identified, and no new malfunctions were identified either.Based upon these results, no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot part number:357.369, synthes lot number: 6286330, supplier lot number: 79041, release to warehouse date: 19dec2009, expiration date: n/a, supplier: (b)(4).No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|