|
Device Problems
Burst Container or Vessel (1074); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The physician in this case consented to participate in the survey but did not consent to be contacted regarding the information provided and wished to remain anonymous, therefore information for facility and city cannot be provided.Please note that this device (endeavor resolute) is not marketed in the united states; however, it is similar to the united states marketed product (resolute integrity).This event is being reported only as a malfunction because of the similar device requirement in 803 which is limited to malfunctions.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic conducted a post market clinical follow-up (pmcf) survey to seek out potential new risks and assess performance of the endeavor resolute drug-eluting coronary stent system.Survey results from an interventional cardiologist in practice 12 years.In the past 12 months the physician has used the endeavor resolute rx drug-eluting stent 150 times.35 of the smallest (2.25 x 8 mm), 75 of the intermediate (2.25 x 12 mm to 4.00 x 24 mm) and 40 of the largest (4.00 x 30 mm) sizes were used.It was also noted that inthe last 12 months the endeavor resolute drug-eluting coronary stent system was used in non-coronary procedures including 60 peripheral artery disease treatments.The following complications adverse events/effects were encountered in the using the product over the last 12 months: two balloon rupture events, related to a pre-existing condition or comorbidity one rash event, related to a pre-existing condition or comorbidity it was reported that the device did not perform as expected in terms of reaching the target lesion in 5 cases due to it not being possible to intervene the lesion.It was reported that the device did not perform as expected in terms of dilation of the target lesion in 3 cases due to the lesion being too calcified.It was reported that the device did not perform as expected in terms of the ability to achieve thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (timi) flow 3 in 2 cases due to pronounced thrombosis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|