|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the perfix light plug.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix light plug.Per operative notes, ¿ direct hernia was identified and dissected.The extra large perfix light plug was placed over the defect and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia and left inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with removal of previously placed mesh and implant of two synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿ large hernias were noted bilaterally.On right recurrent side, a balled mass of prosthetic mesh was identified.The mesh was seen protruding into abdominal cavity from hernia defect.The mesh was excised and defects on the left and right side was repaired with two synthetic meshes and tacked.¿.
|