|
Medical product: dynesysâ® tl, ha pedicle screw, cannulated + set screw, 6.0x45; catalog no#: 01.03956.045; lot#: 2933150.Dynesysâ® tl, ha pedicle screw, cannulated + set screw, 6.0x40; catalog no#: 01.03956.040; lot#: 2910554.Dynesysâ® tl, ha pedicle screw, cannulated + set screw, 6.0x40; catalog no#: 01.03956.040; lot#: 2863974.Dynesysâ® tl, ha pedicle screw, cannulated + set screw, 5.2x40; catalog no#: 01.03955.240; lot#: 2842582.Dynesysâ® tl, ha pedicle screw, cannulated + set screw, 5.2x40; catalog no#: 01.03955.240; lot#: 2842583.Therapy date: (b)(6) 2020.The manufacturer did receive per and product labels for review.The manufacturer did not receive the device for investigation.Where lot numbers were received for the devices, the device history records were reviewed and found to be conforming.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.As soon as supplemental information becomes available an updated report will be submitted.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|
|
Event description: it was reported that the patient received a dynesys implant (left side t10/l4, right side l4/5) on (b)(6) 2019 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020 to a fusion as the tether did not provide the expected correction because the applied tension did not allow for the patient's growth spurt.Review of received data: patient data: (b)(6), female, born (b)(6) 2006.Neither patient data nor medical records were obtained.Product evaluation: product was not returned by hospital; therefore, product evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Conclusion: it was reported that the 13-year-old female patient received a dynesys implant (left side t10/l4, right side l4/5) on (b)(6) 2019 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020 to a fusion as the tether did not provide the expected correction because the applied tension did not allow for the patient's growth spurt.Neither patient data nor medical records were obtained.The product was not returned by hospital; therefore, product evaluation could not be performed.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a non-conformance or a complaint out of box (coob).Based on the description a product issue was not identified.The most likely cause for the conversion to a fusion is procedure and patient related.Nevertheless, based on the lack of information no exact root cause could be identified.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer switzerland manufacturing gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|