The device was not returned for evaluation; it was discarded at the hospital.Without return of the unit it is not possible to determine if some damage or defect existed on the unit that could have contributed to the event.It is not known if some procedural factors may have contributed to the event.No corrective actions will be taken at this time.A review of the manufacturing records indicated that the product met specifications upon release.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the introducer, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.In this case, the patient required a new stick to insert a new guidewire.It is unknown if user or procedural factors may have contributed to this event.A 100% visual inspection is performed to all wires to ensure that it meets the following conditions: free of kinks, bump free, are not frayed, are not stretched or exposed and the end or tip must be in the shape of a j.It should be noted that the ifu covers the correct insertion and handling of the guidewire.It specifies that the guidewire should never be forced and if difficulty is met during insertion, completely withdraw the guidewire and reattempt insertion.Also, a "caution note" indicates to avoid possible severing of the guidewire, do not withdraw the guidewire against the needle bevel.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
As reported, when inserting this introducer into an (b)(6) year-old male patient, there was resistance with the guidewire.The device had to be removed and a new puncture was needed to continue.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was not available for evaluation.
|