The reported event could be confirmed, through the additional patient medical reports that were shared.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned.The batch record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.A few preoperative and postoperative radiographs were shared.Along with that an extensive medical record of the patient was also shared.Following that, these were shared to our hcp for a medical opinion.Strictly based on the information available, the medical opinion he shared was that the fracture/luxation was temporarily fixed with k-wires successfully and that there was no need for plates and screw.The luxation was fixed after a few weeks and then the material should be taken out to allow the normal function of the tarso-metatarsal joint.Even if the plate and screws were used, they should have been removed much earlier in a timely manner.Then one could see whether further residual symptoms remain.The luxation will-on the long term-lead to alterations and arthrosis in the tarso-metatarsal joints involved.He further opined that the pain is most likely related to the devices and he would recommend extracting them, as they no longer provide any function but only interferes with normal function in the tarso-metatarsal joint.Based on the medical records and hcp¿s medical opinion, the root cause of the failure is determined to be user and patient related, but predominantly user related.Although the pain is related to the device, but it is because of its prolonged stay inside the patient rather than any deficiency in itself.If any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|