CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Failure to Align (2522)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/29/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please note that device reported is a trapease vena cava filter and for which the catalog and lot numbers are not currently available.Patient age and medical history were also not provided.If obtained, a follow up report will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.The device remains implanted and is not available for evaluation.Please note that the contact is not a medical professional but a more accurate choice is not available.It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The indication for the filter implant has not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported in the legal brief, a patient was treated with a trapease vena cava filter which subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury, damage, including, but not limited to tilt.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life- threatening and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result.The patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering and other damages.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received per the medical records state that the filter was deployed via the patient's right side femoral vein.It was placed proximal to the renal veins without difficulty.The patient tolerated the procedure.There were no reported complications.A post- procedural venocavogram showed that the filter was in satisfactory position. additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced filter tilt, emotional distress, mental anguish, anxiety and stress.The patient became aware of the reported events approximately eight years and five months after the index procedure.The form also states that a computed tomography (ct) scan revealed filter tilt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The patient reported becoming aware of filter tilt, as indicated by a computed tomography (ct) scan, approximately eight years and five months post implant.The patient also reports anxiety related to the filter.According to the medical report the filter was placed via the right femoral vein and deployed proximal to the renal veins without difficulty.A post- procedural venocavogram showed that the filter was in satisfactory position.The patient tolerated the procedure with no reported complications.The indication for the filter implant has not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Anxiety does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|