• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 HF-T; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 HF-T; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 365608
Medical Device Problem Code Premature End-of-Life Indicator (1480)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/17/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Device went from 4 percent battery on (b)(6) 2020 to eos on (b)(6) 2020.Device remains implanted.No adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
We received your event description for the above mentioned device and would like to thank you for supporting our post-market surveillance.As of today, the medical device is not available for analysis, therefore the device itself could not be investigated.The information you provided has been entered into our quality system as a complaint.These types of complaints are used to evaluate systems and device performance throughout our organization and help to maintain and improve the performance of our devices.Should additional relevant information or the device itself become available, the investigation will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
On (b)(6) 2020 - device explanted (b)(6) 2020.We received your event description for the above mentioned device and would like to thank you for supporting our post-market surveillance.As of today, the medical device is not available for analysis, therefore the device itself could not be investigated.The information you provided has been entered into our quality system as a complaint.These types of complaints are used to evaluate systems and device performance throughout our organization and help to maintain and improve the performance of our devices.Should additional relevant information or the device itself become available, the investigation will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device explanted (b)(6) 2020.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this icd were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The icd interrogation revealed the eos battery status, detected on (b)(6) 2020.The device was implanted for 96 months.An amount of 34 charging cycles was documented.The memory content of the icd was inspected, revealing a normal current consumption of this device.However, the amount of charge taken from the battery was verified and the battery condition was not as expected.In order to obtain further insights, the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection showed no anomalies.Subsequently the current consumption of the electronic module was verified by direct measurement and proved to be as expected and consistent with the interrogated icd data.There was no indication of a malfunction of the electronic module.Therefore, the battery was disconnected from the electronic module and sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process associated with this battery.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.In a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis.During the analysis of the inner assembly an elevated internal battery impedance was identified.It is reasonable to assume that the increased impedance has led to a voltage drop and therefore to the clinical consequence.In conclusion, analysis revealed an elevated battery impedance as the root cause of the clinical observation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 740 HF-T
Common Device Name
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
MDR Report Key10551245
Report Number1028232-2020-03966
Device Sequence Number19581501
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier04035479110277
UDI-Public04035479110277
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P050023
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2013
Device Model Number365608
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/17/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/18/2020
09/22/2020
09/17/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/17/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/21/2020
09/23/2020
09/21/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
-
-