|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the cable tensioner is badly frayed, after cutting the cable loose from the patient and it frayed and got stuck in the tensioner.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay reported.The procedure outcome was unknown.There was no damage to the patient.This report is for one (1) 1.7mm cable with crimp 750mm-sterile.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: device history record (dhr) review could not be complete as the lot is unknown for the the 1.7mm cable with crimp 750mm-sterile (part 298.801.01s).Note: the complaint device was evaluated and investigated by the manufacturer/supplier: rti (b)(4)).Flow: device interaction/functional.Visual inspection: visual inspection by rti revealed that the 1.7mm cable with crimp 750mm-sterile was returned stuck in the tensioner.The tensioner was disassembled to allow removable of the frayed cable.Functional testing: the tensioner was disassembled and the cable was removed.A dimensional inspection was not performed as the cable was frayed which is a post manufacturing damage.Document/specification review: current drawing was reviewed.Lot number of the cable is unknown therefore manufactured drawing could not be reviewed.No design issues or discrepancies were identified during review.Conclusion: the complaint was confirmed during investigation as the as received condition of device showed the frayed cable stuck inside the tensioner and unable to disassemble.No definitive root cause could be attributed based on the information received but it is likely that device's failure occurred.No new, unique, or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventive action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|