It was reported that there was an issue with enduro meniscal.
According to the complaint description, it was reported that fracture of axis occured.
Both axis and inlay changed.
The primary implantation of the prosthesis was on (b)(6) 2012 in the (b)(6).
The first inlay and axis revision due to suspicion of infection was on (b)(6) 2014, the second for the same reason on (b)(6) 2017, both in (b)(6).
Now the third revision on (b)(6) 2020, the axis and the inlay changed, but the existing locknut was reused.
Additional information has been requested but not yet received as of this report.
Additional patient information is not available.
The adverse event / malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|