• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN JOURNEY BCS / JOURNEY II BCS KNEE; PROSTH,KNEE,PATFEMTIB,SEMCONSTR,CEMNT,POL/METL/POL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN JOURNEY BCS / JOURNEY II BCS KNEE; PROSTH,KNEE,PATFEMTIB,SEMCONSTR,CEMNT,POL/METL/POL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Joint Laxity (4526)
Date of Event 07/09/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a tka surgery had been performed, the patient had an unstable knee, with pain and clunking noise.A total revision surgery was performed to explant all components.The event is still ongoing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation, therefore the failure could not be confirmed.The clinical/ medical team concluded, per complaint details, the patient required a 1st revision/poly exchange within 9 months of implantation and then underwent a 2nd tka revision approximately 1.5 years later due to instability with pain and clunking.Per correspondence, the patient is unable to forward medical records for inclusion in a medical investigation.Based on the limited information provided, the root cause of the reported instability, pain and clunking could not be concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported symptoms could not be definitively determined; however, the patient reported ¿doing much better now after a complete revision in july¿.No further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional clinically relevant documentation/information become available, the clinical/ medical task may be re-evaluated.Factors and/ or some potential probable causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified as overuse or excessive pressure on the joint, injury, infection and/ or patient condition.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the root cause of the reported instability, pain and clunking could not be concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported symptoms could not be definitively determined.No further medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed in the possible adverse effects that unusual stress concentrations can result from trauma, improper implant selection, improper implant positioning, improper fixation, and/or migration of the components.Muscle and fibrous tissue laxity can also contribute to these conditions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include joint laxity, patient condition, traumatic injury, joint tightness, alignment or wear.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN JOURNEY BCS / JOURNEY II BCS KNEE
Common Device Name
PROSTH,KNEE,PATFEMTIB,SEMCONSTR,CEMNT,POL/METL/POL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 
5123913905
MDR Report Key10564422
Report Number1020279-2020-04765
Device Sequence Number14101003
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier03596010206282
UDI-Public03596010206282
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/26/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/08/2021
11/27/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/21/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/28/2021
11/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-