|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other complaints.Based on the information provided, the balloon rupture appears to be due to case circumstances.It is likely that the balloon rupture occurred due to interaction with the severely calcified lesion causing damage to the outer surface of the balloon material.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|