|
As reported, the balloon of the two (2) 6mm x 4cm x 80cm powerflex extreme percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter minimally inflated and leaked unknown contrast.Therefore, the balloons were removed, and another unknown balloon was used to complete the case.There was no reported patient injury.The balloons advanced over the unknown wire into vessel.The physician attempted to inflate the balloons using a syringe with 50/50 saline and contrast ratio.The operator was trained to the powerflex extreme device.The devices were stored as per labeling and prepped in sterile filed as per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, or the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks nor other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device prepped normally (i.E.Maintain negative pressure).Ge omnipaque contrast media was used.The contrast to saline ratio was 50/50.A syringe inflation device was used.The same indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, or while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (total occlusion >3 months).There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter was never in an acute bend.The balloon catheter did not kink while being used.The product was removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.The devices will be returned for evaluation.
|
|
This is one of two reports submitted for the same event.Please reference mfr report #: 9616099-2020-03927.Complaint conclusion: as reported, the balloon of the two (2) 6mm x 4cm x 80cm powerflex extreme percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheters minimally inflated and leaked unknown contrast.Therefore, the balloons were removed, and another unknown balloon was used to complete the case.There was no reported patient injury.The balloons advanced over the unknown wire into vessel.The physician attempted to inflate the balloons using a syringe with 50/50 saline and contrast ratio.The operator was trained to the powerflex extreme device.The devices were stored as per labeling and prepped in sterile field as per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, or the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks nor other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device prepped normally (i.E.Maintain negative pressure).Non-cordis contrast media was used.The contrast to saline ratio was 50/50.A syringe inflation device was used.The same indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, or while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (total occlusion >3 months).There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter was never in an acute bend.The balloon catheter did not kink while being used.The product was removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.The device was returned for analysis.One non-sterile unit of a powerflex extreme 6x4 80cm was received for analysis under this complaint.The unit was received coiled inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis of the unit received, the balloon had been previously inflated and blood residues were observed inside the balloon.The unit was thoroughly inspected at naked eye and no other anomalies were observed.Per functional analysis, balloon inflation test was performed on the unit received.The balloon couldn¿t be inflated at first, the cross-section analysis was performed, and saline solution crystals were observed on the inflation lumen.Then the crystals were removed, and the balloon was inflated successfully at 20 atm (device¿s rated burst pressure) with the inflator device; neither a leakage nor a burst was observed on the balloon.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82183780 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon - leakage - during positive pressure¿ was not confirmed through analysis of the returned device.The exact cause of the reported leakage could not be determined.Per functional analysis of the balloon, there was no leakage or rupture noted upon inflation the device maintained positive pressure at 20atm the device¿s rbp.The device performed as intended, procedural factors and handling of the device likely contributed to the event reported by the customer.Based on the information available for review, the dried contrast crystals may have prevented the balloon to inflate properly.According to the safety information in the instructions for use ¿prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.Flush the ¿thru¿ lumen with sterile heparinized saline or a similar isotonic solution.Place the prepared catheter over a prepositioned guidewire and advance the tip to the introduction site.Carefully advance the catheter to the selected stenosis.Caution: if strong resistance is met during advancement or withdrawal of the catheter, discontinue movement and determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.If the cause of resistance cannot be determined, withdraw the entire system.¿ neither the phr review nor the product analysis suggests that the event experienced by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
|