| Catalog Number |
5990015 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
02/07/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st (x2) on (b)(6) 2019 and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and 510 k number.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st using echo ps 2 (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st using echo ps (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st (x2) on (b)(6) 2019 and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps 2 (device 1).Per op notes, "a ventralight st mesh using echo ps 2 (device 1) was placed to the abdomen using sutures." (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 2).Per op notes, "the previous mesh (device 1) was dissected off the abdominal wall.A ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 2) was placed to the abdomen using sutures.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|