• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number SONATA
Device Problems Impedance Problem (2950); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it is to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event Description
Family referred inconsistent responses, sometimes the patient responded better to auditory stimulus, sometimes no responses at all.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: according to the currently available information, damage to the active electrode, as it might be caused by an external mechanical impact appears likely.However to confirm an exact root cause of failure a device investigation of the explanted device is necessary.No date for revision surgery has been communicated yet.
 
Event Description
The user's hearing performance with the device is affected.Re-implantation has been recommend, though has not been decided upon yet.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: according to the currently available information, damage to the active electrode, as it might be caused by an external mechanical impact appears likely.However, to confirm an exact root cause of failure a device investigation of the explanted device is necessary.The concerned device was explanted but has not been received for investigation yet.
 
Event Description
The recipient's hearing performance with the device is affected.The recipient has been re-implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: overload fractures in the active electrode which are consistent with an external mechanical impact were determined to be the root cause of device failure.The active electrode also showed some additional damage to the electrode wires, as being caused by minute device mobility.An accident or impact might have weakened the fixation of the implant, consequently leading to electrode mobility.The problems given in the recipient report appear to match the damage found.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
The recipient's hearing performance with the device is affected.The recipient has been re-implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key10598073
MDR Text Key208930545
Report Number9710014-2020-00522
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737083618
UDI-Public(01)09008737083618
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/29/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/17/2018
Device Model NumberSONATA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/16/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age7 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-