Medtronic received information from a literature case report regarding an (b)(6)-year-old male patient with a history of surgical aortic valve replacement (savr) with a 27 mm non-medtronic surgical aortic valve, permanent pacemaker implantation for complete heart block following savr, and one functional kidney following a road traffic accident as a child.Approximately thirteen years after savr, the patient presented with decompensated heart failure.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) showed complete degeneration of thenon-coronary leaflet of the surgical aortic valve with severe transvalvular aortic incompetence (ai).The medical team decided to proceed with semi-emergent valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (viv-tavr) via left femoral access.A 26 mm medtronic evolut r transcatheter valve (serial number not provided) was implanted inside the degenerated surgical aortic valve.Despite several attempts to achieve a supra-annular position, optimal positioning of the evolut r was difficult, and the valve was ultimately deployed in a suboptimal low position in the left ventricular outflow tract (lvot).Following deployment, the valve fully expanded and peri-procedural mild-moderate paravalvular leak (pvl) was noted.The patient¿s condition rapidly improved and was discharged home four days after viv-tavr.Discharge transthoracic echocardiography (tte) exhibited mild pvl.One year and six months after viv-tavr, the patient presented with decompensated heart failure.Upon examination, chest auscultation was consistent with severe ai and pulmonary edema.Urgent tee was performed, which revealed the evolut r was ¿low-lying¿ and detailed assessment confirmed the valve had migrated down the lvot by 5 mm since the viv-tavr procedure.The physician/author stated there was no evidence of neoleaflet fracture.Severe transvalvular ai and moderate posterior pvl were noted and concurrent tte showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30%, right ventricle impairment, moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and significant pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure: 70 mm hg).Subsequently, the medical team decided to perform a tavr-in-tavr procedure with pre-planned cardiopulmonary bypass support.Coronary protection was achieved with the placement of a non-medtronic coronary wire and balloon in the left anterior descending coronary artery and was followed by implantation of a 26 mm non-medtronic transcatheter valve inside of the evolut r.Despite a good valve position, the non-medtronic transcatheter valve was constrained within the leaflets of the evolut r, so a post-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with a 25 mm non-medtronic balloon.Following the bav, aortography showed no evidence of coronary obstruction or pvl.The patient¿s condition again rapidly improved and was discharged home eight days after tavr-in-tavr.Discharge tte exhibited no pvl, reduced mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and decreased pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure: 50 mm hg).No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
|