• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTR-23
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Insufficiency, Valvular (1926); Left Ventricular Dysfunction (1947); Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Pulmonary Edema (2020); Right Ventricular Dysfunction (2054); Tricuspid Regurgitation (2112); Heart Failure (2206); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 06/12/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: duncan a et al.Midterm degeneration of transcatheter heart valve device following valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement requiring repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Case (phila).2020 jun 12;4(4):291-298.Doi: 10.1016/j.Case.2020.04.008.Earliest date of publish used for date of event.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information from a literature case report regarding an (b)(6)-year-old male patient with a history of surgical aortic valve replacement (savr) with a 27 mm non-medtronic surgical aortic valve, permanent pacemaker implantation for complete heart block following savr, and one functional kidney following a road traffic accident as a child.Approximately thirteen years after savr, the patient presented with decompensated heart failure.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) showed complete degeneration of thenon-coronary leaflet of the surgical aortic valve with severe transvalvular aortic incompetence (ai).The medical team decided to proceed with semi-emergent valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (viv-tavr) via left femoral access.A 26 mm medtronic evolut r transcatheter valve (serial number not provided) was implanted inside the degenerated surgical aortic valve.Despite several attempts to achieve a supra-annular position, optimal positioning of the evolut r was difficult, and the valve was ultimately deployed in a suboptimal low position in the left ventricular outflow tract (lvot).Following deployment, the valve fully expanded and peri-procedural mild-moderate paravalvular leak (pvl) was noted.The patient¿s condition rapidly improved and was discharged home four days after viv-tavr.Discharge transthoracic echocardiography (tte) exhibited mild pvl.One year and six months after viv-tavr, the patient presented with decompensated heart failure.Upon examination, chest auscultation was consistent with severe ai and pulmonary edema.Urgent tee was performed, which revealed the evolut r was ¿low-lying¿ and detailed assessment confirmed the valve had migrated down the lvot by 5 mm since the viv-tavr procedure.The physician/author stated there was no evidence of neoleaflet fracture.Severe transvalvular ai and moderate posterior pvl were noted and concurrent tte showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30%, right ventricle impairment, moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and significant pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure: 70 mm hg).Subsequently, the medical team decided to perform a tavr-in-tavr procedure with pre-planned cardiopulmonary bypass support.Coronary protection was achieved with the placement of a non-medtronic coronary wire and balloon in the left anterior descending coronary artery and was followed by implantation of a 26 mm non-medtronic transcatheter valve inside of the evolut r.Despite a good valve position, the non-medtronic transcatheter valve was constrained within the leaflets of the evolut r, so a post-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with a 25 mm non-medtronic balloon.Following the bav, aortography showed no evidence of coronary obstruction or pvl.The patient¿s condition again rapidly improved and was discharged home eight days after tavr-in-tavr.Discharge tte exhibited no pvl, reduced mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and decreased pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure: 50 mm hg).No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key10610427
MDR Text Key209348533
Report Number2025587-2020-02980
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEVOLUTR-23
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTR-23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/02/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/30/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age87 YR
-
-