MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO ST; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	5950060
Medical Device Problem Codes	Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and personal injury; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio st (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh-ventralex (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex hernia patch and ventrio st on (b)(6) 2012 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and personal injury; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2018) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), d.6a (date of implant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10 this supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio st (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh -ventralex (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex hernia patch and ventrio st on (b)(6) 2012 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2012 ¿ patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿scar with hernia was dissected and previously implanted mesh was identified and excised.A ventralex mesh (device 1) was placed and sutured.(note: the mesh excised during this procedure is unknown).(b)(6) 2012 ¿ patient had symptomatic suture granuloma of umbilical incision thereby underwent excision of suture granuloma.(b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral incisional hernia and pain thereby underwent open repair with removal of old mesh (device 1) and implant of ventrio st mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia defect with previous mesh (device 1) was identified.Hernia was reduced; old mesh (device 1) was excised.The adhesions were taken down and ventrio st mesh (device 2) was placed and sutured.¿.

• Brand Name: VENTRIO ST
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 10611388
• Report Number: 1213643-2020-08939
• Device Sequence Number: 2554333
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741031557
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741031557(17)210128(10)HUCZ1139
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: KS
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K101920
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2019
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 09/11/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 01/28/2021
• Device Catalogue Number: 5950060
• Device Lot Number: HUCZ1139
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 09/25/2020
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/22/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 10/01/2020
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 09/11/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 12/15/2018
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Male