• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
510k: this report is for an unknown biomaterial - cement/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: this report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: waschke a., ullrich b., kalff r., schwarz f., (2016) cement-augmented anterior odontoid screw fixation for osteoporotic type ii odontoid fractures in elderly patients: prospective evaluation of 11 patients, european spine journal volume 25(10), pages 115¿121 (germany).This study aims to present prospectively collected data on cement augmented anterior screw fixation of osteoporotic odontoid fractures of elderly patients.Between 03/2012 and 12/2013, a total of eleven patients (8 female, 3 male, median age 83 years, range 73¿89 years) with an isolated, osteoporotic type ii odontoid fracture were treated by cement-augmented anterior odontoid screw fixation.High viscosity polymethylmethacrylate (pmma) cement (confidence spinal cement system, depuy spinetm, leeds, england) was used.Ct examination for evaluation of reduction, screw position and cement distribution were done in every patient on the first postoperative day.Cervical spine radiographs were obtained 3 and 6 months after surgery.A final thin slice ct examination for evaluation of osseous union was done 12 months after surgery in all patients.Mean clinical follow-up was 15 months (6¿34 months).The following complications were reported as follows: one patient died 6 months after surgery for other reasons than the odontoid fracture.In three cases a clinical asymptomatic cement leakage could be detected, one into the c1/2 joint and two into the longus colli muscle (fig.7).After 1-year, thin slice ct with three-dimensional reconstruction did not demonstrate solid bony fusion of the odontoid fracture in 2 patients.In these two patients, fracture gap was yet detectable without sufficient bony bridging.However, these patients had no complaints so that no further intervention was justified.This report is for an unknown depuy spine confidence spinal cement system.This is report 2 of 4 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT
Type of Device
POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
6103142063
MDR Report Key10612468
MDR Text Key209349669
Report Number1526439-2020-01837
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/07/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/01/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/07/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-