| Model Number |
03.100.025 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the surgeon was using the reduction forceps in the appropriate manner when he heard a pop and the hinge pin that connects the two sides broke under the strain.The two (2) 3.5mm cortex screws were backed out, two sides of the clamp removed and the broken hinge peg retrieved without incident.A second pelvic reduction set was opened and the same clamp applied to the two existing 3.5mm screws.Reduction was obtained and a 7.3 x 80mm fully threaded screw with a washer was implanted.Upon final tightening of the screw, the second clamp broke in the same manner.During surgery, all pieces retrieved from the patient.There was a surgical delay of two (2) minutes.Procedure and patient outcome were unknown.Concomitant devices reported: 3.5mm cortex screw (part #: unknown, lot #: unknown, quantity: 2), 7.3 x 80mm fully threaded screw (part #: unknown, lot #: unknown, quantity: 1); washer (part #: unknown, lot #: unknown, quantity: 1).This report is for one (1) low profile pelvic system red forceps used w/3.5mm screws.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Investigation flow: damage.Visual inspection: the low profile pelvic system red forceps used w/3.5 mm screws (p/n:03.100.025, lot #: t940285) was returned and received disassembled at us cq.Upon visual inspection, the device was the connector (p/n: 208.0085) was broken and returned which has caused the complaint condition.There was slight discoloration observed on the device but have no impact on the device functionality.The device failure/defect is identified.Dimensional inspection: no dimensional inspection can be performed due to post-manufacturing damage.Furthermore, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy, because of the design of the device.Document/specification review based on the date of manufacture, the current and manufactured revision of drawings were reviewed.The device received was broken.Hence confirming the allegation.Investigation conclusion the complaint condition is confirmed for the low profile pelvic system red forceps used w/3.5 mm screws (p/n:03.100.025, lot #: t940285).There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.The potential cause could be due to unintended forces applied to the device.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot part number: 03.100.025, lot number: t940285, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: oct 16, 2009.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Review of raw material certificate could not be established during this review due to the age of the device (over 11 years old).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|