• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V2
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 07/15/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The cause of the reported event cannot be determined.If additional information becomes available at a later time, this report will be supplemented.This event has been reported by the importer on mdr# (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Olympus received medwatch 5096215.It was reported that during the beginning of a cystoscopy with bilateral retrograde pyelograms, bilateral ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy and stent, while the physician was using the ureteroscope, the laser did not fire correctly.Subsequently, the physician switched to another fiber and when lasering the ureter, a piece of the fiber broke off into the patient.Per the physician, this was possibly due to the ureteroscope.Retrieval was attempted to no avail as the fragment fell off the basket during removal.The physician was unable to find the fragment.It was noted the same ureteroscope was used to complete the procedure which was delayed by minutes[sic].Per the clinician, patient follow-up appointments indicate no negative outcomes from the procedure.No further attempts to remove the fragment are required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The legal manufacturer reviewed the contents of this complaint.As the results of the dhr review, it was confirmed that the product was shipped conforming to the specifications.The legal manufacturer reported that the root cause could not be determined.The legal manufacturer reported that the most probably cause for the reported event is the following: the event was due to the laser probe breakage.The legal manufacturer reported that it is presumed the following factors attributed to the reported event, based on the ifu and similar complaint investigations.· the laser probe was used with the broken scope, which led to the laser shot penetrating at the location of the probe being massively bent.· the user inserted the laser probe while bending tube was angulated or massively stressed.· angulation was manipulated while the laser probe was inserted in biopsy channel.The legal manufacturer refers to the ifu entries below in an effort to mitigate product damage.Important information ¿ please read before use : warning : never use the endoscope on a patient if an irregularity is observed.Damage or an irregularity in the endoscope may compromise patient or user safety and may result in more severe equipment damage.Particularly, if an examination is continued using an endoscope with its insertion section damaged, the following event may occur: · components of an endoscope fall off inside the patient body.· mucosal damage, bleeding, perforation caused by an exposed metal part from the insertion section.· an endoscope is not smoothly withdrawn from the patient.· an endotherapy accessory is damaged (including components of the accessory falling off inside the patient body, unexpected irradiation from a damaged laser probe).·4.3 using endotherapy accessories : warning : if an endotherapy accessory is used with a damaged endoscope, the accessory may be damaged and the damage may result in the accessory¿s components falling off inside the patient, or patient injury (including unexpected irradiation from a damaged laser probe).·4.4 using the laser system : caution : do not insert the laser probe into the instrument channel while applying an excessive force or bending the bending section.The instrument channel and/or laser probe may be damaged.Do not bend the bending section with excessive force while the laser probe is inserted into the instrument channel.The laser probe may be damaged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
MDR Report Key10619895
MDR Text Key209598006
Report Number8010047-2020-07151
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170343582
UDI-Public04953170343582
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K172246
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other,use
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
200 MICRON LASER FIBER; 365 MICRON LASER FIBER; 200 MICRON LASER FIBER; 365 MICRON LASER FIBER
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient Weight103
-
-