• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97725
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); High impedance (1291)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/30/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 977d260; serial# :(b)(4); implanted: (b)(6) 2020; explanted: (b)(6) 2020; product type: screening device.Product id: 977d260, serial#: (b)(4); implanted: (b)(6) 2020; explanted: (b)(6) 2020; product type: screening device.Product id: 977d260; serial#: (b)(4); implanted: (b)(6) 2020; explanted: (b)(6) 2020; product type: screening device.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 977d260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 22-sep-2024, udi#: (b)(4); product id: 977d260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 10-sep-2024, udi#: (b)(4); product id: 977d260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 10-sep-2024, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The manufacturing representative (rep) reported a spinal cord stimulation trial was performed on (b)(6) 2020.When one lead was placed in the epidural space, and connected to a wireless external neurostimulator (wens), stimulation was activated.The patient could feel no paresthesia.Impedances were checked, and were found to be all >10,000.Lead connectivity was good.First lead was explanted, and second lead was placed with the same results.An additional wens was tried, which produced the same results.The second lead was explanted, and a third lead was placed producing the same results.The trial was aborted, and the issue resolved.Physician requested that the product be returned for analysis.There were high impedances and no stimulation felt.There were no known environmental, or patient factors led to, or contributed to the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of product id 977d260 lot# serial#(b)(6), product id 977d260 lot# serial# (b)(6), product id 977d260 lot# serial# (b)(6) found no anomaly.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of the wireless external neurostimulator (serial number (b)(6) ) found that the batteries were depleted.When known good batteries were used the device functioned normally.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Common Device Name
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea street ne mvs21
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key10627205
Report Number3007566237-2020-00375
Device Sequence Number14104386
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000017590
UDI-Public00763000017590
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNV
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P840001
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/15/2021
Device Model Number97725
Device Catalogue Number97725
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/20/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/30/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/28/2020
03/04/2021
11/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/05/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/02/2020
03/07/2021
11/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
"SEE H10...."; "SEE H11...."
Patient SexMale
-
-