|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010215 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Unspecified Infection (1930); Seroma (2069); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
03/12/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this is an addendum to the initial emdr.This supplemental emdr was submitted to report the corrected product catalog no.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6a (date of implant), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated incisional recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventrio mesh (device #1).Per op notes, "an elliptical incision was made about the old scar, a ventrio mesh (device #1) was placed using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with infected seroma thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh (device #1).Per op notes, "adhesions were taken down from the anterior abdominal wall to the mesh.The mesh (device #1) was excised.There was an abscess cavity above the mesh." (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with intra-abdominal abscess thereby underwent incision and drainage of intra-abdominal abscess.(b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of bard flat mesh (device #2).Per op notes, "a transverse elliptical incision in the mid abdomen, a bard flat mesh (device #2) was placed.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|