• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 20 DEG +4 XLPE ACET LNR 28MM X 46MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 20 DEG +4 XLPE ACET LNR 28MM X 46MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 71337746
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Injury (2348)
Date of Event 09/10/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that primary procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2015.Patient dislocated 2 months ago and the hip was relocated but three weeks ago patient dislocated again bending over pulling weeds.Revision surgery was performed and oxinium fem hd 12/14 28mm -3 and r3 20 deg +4 xlpe acet lnr 28mm x 46mm were explanted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that based on the limited information provided, the root cause of the reported dislocations were most likely the lack of posterior hip precautions (status post recent hip dislocation with subsequent reduction) finally exacerbated when the patient was reportedly ¿bending over pulling weeds¿.No details were provided on the first dislocation; however, it would not be uncommon for the surrounding tissues to be disrupted and/or weakened following the first reported dislocation/reduction leading to a higher risk.The patient impact beyond the reported recurrent dislocation and subsequent revision procedure could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode and potential harm was previously identified.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved or product information, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the root cause of the reported dislocations were most likely the lack of posterior hip precautions (status post recent hip dislocation with subsequent reduction) finally exacerbated when the patient was reportedly ¿bending over pulling weeds¿.No details were provided on the first dislocation; however, it would not be uncommon for the surrounding tissues to be disrupted and/or weakened following the first reported dislocation/reduction leading to a higher risk.The patient impact beyond the reported recurrent dislocation and subsequent revision procedure could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors and/or some potential probable causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified as abnormal motion over time, bone degeneration, fit/sizing issue, lack of ingrowth, lifetime of device, and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 20 DEG +4 XLPE ACET LNR 28MM X 46MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
MDR Report Key10646487
Report Number1020279-2020-05228
Device Sequence Number11388790
Product Code MBL
UDI-Device Identifier03596010598554
UDI-Public03596010598554
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K113848
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/05/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number71337746
Device Catalogue Number71337746
Device Lot Number18DM20771
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/10/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/26/2021
10/04/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/07/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/28/2021
10/05/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-