| Catalog Number |
0134113 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
06/27/2011
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix l/p.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the patient id.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jan-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #3).An additional emdr's were submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #1 & device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix l/p.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent symptomatic umbilical hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of two composix l/p mesh (device #1 & #2).Per op notes, "the composix l/p mesh (device #1 & #2) were placed and sutured." (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p mesh (device #3).Per op notes, "a composix l/p mesh (device #3) was placed, sutured and tacked." (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair with explant of composix l/p meshes (device #1, #2 & #3) and implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, "two pieces of old mesh (device #1 & #2) were removed.A large mesh (device #3) was also removed entirely with tackers.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|