|
Event description: it was reported that the patient underwent an initial hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2010 and underwent revision on (b)(6) 2018.During revision surgery, the patient was implanted with a biolox head.Subsequently, the patient experienced implant dislocation (b)(6) 2018 and required medical intervention to re-establish component positioning.Review of received data: due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.No medical documents have been received.Legal documents have been received, descibing the patient's medical history and the legal claim.No findings relevant to the dislocation.Product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient underwent an initial hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2010 and underwent revision on (b)(6) 2018.During revision surgery, the patient was implanted with a biolox head.Subsequently, the patient experienced implant dislocation (b)(6) 2018 and required medical intervention to re-establish component positioning.Based on the investigation the reported event cannot be confirmed.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a nonconformance or a complaint out of box (coob).As no x-rays have been received, the correct implant positioning cannot be analyzed.The reasons for hip dislocation are multifactorial, with contributing factors from the patient, the implant, and the surgical procedure.Possible root causes include wrong head offset choice, inadequate assembling procedure, high patient acitivity, inadequate information during patients counseling by surgeon leading to premature failure caused by patient behaviour, patient disregarding the limits of the device or joint laxity.In conclusion, as the cause may be multifactorial an exact root cause could not be identified.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|