• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 MARKSMAN; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 MARKSMAN; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number FA-55150-1030
Device Problems Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/16/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The pipeline flex device was returned stuck inside the distal segment of the marksman catheter.The pipeline flex could not be pushed forward or removed.For further examination, the catheter was cut to remove the pipeline flex from the catheter lumen.The distal and proximal dps restraints were found to be intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched with the ptfe shrink tubing still intact.When pushing the pipeline flex braid out from the catheter lumen, the distal and proximal ends of the pipeline flex were found fully opened and moderately frayed.No bends or kinks were found with pusher.No damages were found with the distal marker, re-sheathing marker, re-sheathing pad or with the proximal bumper.The total and usable lengths of the catheter were measured to be within specifications.The catheter tip and marker were examined; and no damages were found.The catheter body was found to be separated at ~32.0cm from distal end.In addition, the catheter body found to be accordioned from ~29.5cm to ~31.3cm from the distal tip.No flash or voids molded were observed in the hub.The catheter was then tested by running an in-house 0.0265¿ mandrel through catheter tip and hub.The mandrel successfully passed through the catheter hub and tip with no issues; however, the resistance observed at the damaged locations.Based on the analysis findings, the pipeline flex and marksman were confirmed to have resistance during delivery as the returned pipeline flex was stuck inside the marksman catheter.The pipeline flex and the marksman catheter were found to be damaged.From the damages seen on catheter body (accordioning/separating), pipeline flex braid (fraying) and hypotube (stretching); it appears there was high force used.It is likely these damages occurred when the customer attempted to advance the pipeline flex through the marksman catheter against resistance.It is likely that patient tortuous anatomy may have contributed to the resistance during delivery.The customer reported that the devices were prepared per the ifu and c continuous flush was maintained during delivery.Based on the returned devices, there was no non-conformance to specifications identified that led to the resistance during delivery issue.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding a pipeline which had resistance and became stuck in a marksman microcatheter.The patient was being treated for a ruptured saccular aneurysm of the right ophthalmic artery.The aneurysm max diameter was 6mm and the neck diameter was 5mm.Vessel tortuosity was severe.It was reported that first a phenom27 microcatheter was going to be used but during preparation the catheter was observed to be kinked so it was replaced with a marksman catheter.The devices were prepared and used per instructions for use (ifu).The catheter was flushed per ifu.The intracranial support catheter was to the aneurysm site.The marksman was then advanced into the m1 segment.The pipeline was advancing through the marksman but began having resistance in the middle section and could not track to the deployment location and the pipeline became stuck in the distal end.Multiple attempts were made to adjust placement of the support catheter and microcatheter as well as release the slack in the system but the pipeline still could not be moved.The surgeon then removed the pipeline and marksman together and it appeared they may have been stretched and the pipeline pushwire kinked.The catheter was flushed continuously during the procedure with heparinized saline.The procedure was ultimately completed with successful coil compaction of the aneurysm though it was determined a pipeline should still be placed at a later date.There was no harm or injury to the patient.Ancillary devices: navien intracranial support catheter, non-medtronic sheath and guidewire there was very little resistance, if any, when attempting to remove the marksman and pipeline.The resistance was within the marksman.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MARKSMAN
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
tricha miles
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635140379
MDR Report Key10659776
MDR Text Key212783059
Report Number2029214-2020-01010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
UDI-Device Identifier00836462014077
UDI-Public00836462014077
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K091559
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/21/2022
Device Model NumberFA-55150-1030
Device Catalogue NumberFA-55150-1030
Device Lot Number218286978
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/23/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/26/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age35 YR
-
-