|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112910 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
09/27/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol visilex (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol perfix plug (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol visilex on (b)(6) 2006, perfix plug on (b)(6) 2016 and phasix on (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the visilex and perfix plug.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol visilex (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol perfix plug (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol visilex on (b)(6) 2006, perfix plug on (b)(6) 2016 and phasix on (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the visilex and perfix plug.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2006 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of visilex mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿an indirect hernia sac was identified and reduced.The visilex mesh (device 1) was placed and tacked.The fascia was closed with sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia and pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device 2).Per op notes, ¿a small direct hernia sac was identified in the floor of inguinal canal and reduced.A perfix plug (device 2) was placed in the defect and was secured with sutures.Adhesions were taken down.No indirect hernia was identified.A onlay patch was placed in the floor of canal and secured with sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and right groin pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with appendectomy.Per op notes, ¿appendix was identified in the right lower quadrant and adherent to anterior abdominal wall.The appendix was incarcerated in a hernia.There was evidence of perforation into prior mesh (device 2).There was no recurrent hernia.The appendix was removed.The prior mesh was well incorporated and unable to remove.The exposed mesh was noted and tacked with sorbafix tacker.Saline irrigation was performed.¿ (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient had postoperative abscess was drained out.(b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with right groin mesh infection and recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of perfix plug (device 2) and implant of phasix st (device 3).Per op notes, ¿adhesions between prior mesh (device 2) and shelving edge were lysed.The onlay mesh was crumpled and excised.The mesh plug (device 2) was excised entirely.At proximal point of mesh, cloudy fluid was noted and drained.The inguinal floor was closed with sutures.A phasix st (device 3) was placed and secured with sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|