• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL ENVOY 5F, MPC 100 CM; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL ENVOY 5F, MPC 100 CM; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 556-256-00
Medical Device Problem Code Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 08/01/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).This is one of two products involved with the complaint and the associated manufacturer report number is 3008114965-2020-00369.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during a cerebral angiography, aspiration air came in and during injection water came out at the beginning of on an envoy 5f, mpc 100 cm catheter (55625600, 30247204).There was a procedural delay of five minutes due to the event.The procedure was successfully completed.There was no patient injury reported.Additional information clarified that the aspiration was ¿right¿, the catheter suck air between the hub.The device did not appear kinked, compressed, cracked or had any other damage.There was no evidence of air being injected into the patient due to the leakage.No excessive force was applied to the device.The target vessel/site was the right vertebrate.One non-sterile envoy 5f, mpc 100 cm unit was received inside of a pouch.The received device was visually inspected, and it was found with dry blood residues outside the hub.The returned device envoy 5f, mpc 100 cm was flushed using a lab sample syringe, during the test, a leakage was observed at the hub area.Due to the leakage condition, the hub of the device was inspected under microscope, and it was found with a cracked condition.According to the reporter¿s additional information received, ¿the hub would have been porous, and it would have felt different." due to what is being reported, a sem analysis was performed in order to verify if the surface of the complaint catheter showed considerable differences compared to a catheter in good condition.The sem results, and conclusion were that no significant difference was found between the samples analyzed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30247204 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The complaint reported by the customer, ¿catheter (body/shaft) leakage,¿ was confirmed, during the functional test.The catheter was flushed using a lab sample syringe and leakage was detected at the hub area.The sem results showed no significant differences between the complaint device and the sample device, the cracked condition observed on the hub may have been related with a tight rhv at the procedure time, however this cannot conclusively determine.Neither the analysis nor the mre suggest that the failure reported by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative, and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and the evidence presented by the returned device.However, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation and device interaction, may have contributed to the reported failure and damages on the returned system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field, during a cerebral angiography, aspiration air came in and during injection water came out at the beginning of on an envoy 5f, mpc 100 cm catheter (55625600, 30247204).There was a procedural delay of five minutes due to the event.The procedure was successfully completed.There was no patient injury reported.Additional information clarified that the aspiration was ¿right¿, the catheter suck air between the hub.The device did not appear kinked, compressed, cracked or had any other damage.There was no evidence of air being injected into the patient due to the leakage.No excessive force was applied to the device.The target vessel/site was the right vertebrae.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENVOY 5F, MPC 100 CM
Common Device Name
PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
MDR Report Key10670940
Report Number3008114965-2020-00459
Device Sequence Number2991431
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier10886704027935
UDI-Public10886704027935
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K000715
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,health professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2022
Device Model Number556-256-00
Device Catalogue Number55625600
Device Lot Number30247204
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2020
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/22/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/13/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-