| Catalog Number |
0112700 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
11/16/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x2) on (b)(6) 2016 and (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct brand name root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jul-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard mesh pre-shaped (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard mesh pre-shaped (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x2) on (b)(6) 2016 and (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of bard pre-shaped mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was noted and reduced.A bard pre-shaped mesh (device 1) was placed and tacked using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia with pain thereby underwent open repair with implant bard pre-shaped mesh (device 2).Per op notes, ¿the previous scar was excised.The prior mesh (device 1) was noted in position.The hernia sac was noted, and the contents of sac were reduced.A bard pre-shaped mesh (device 2) was placed and sutured.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|