| Model Number |
UCR |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The subject device was not returned to the olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) for evaluation.Omsc reviewed the manufacture history (dhr) of the device and confirmed no irregularity.The exact cause of the reported phenomenon could not be conclusively determined.However, there was the possibility that the reported phenomenon was attributed to the accidental failure of the internal component of the subject device.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) was informed from the user that during preparation for use of the subject device, the failure of insufflation co2 occurred intermittently.Olympus (b)(4) checked the subject device and found that the reported phenomenon could not duplicated and the foreign matter had entered the gas tube due to the damage of the internal component.There was no report of patient injury associated with this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This supplemental report is to inform that upon further review, per the legal manufacturer, there is no potential for this issue to cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.Initially, we determined that the event was mdr reportable due to a backflow of liquid from the water container into the unit co2 regulator (ucr), in which case we determined that it was a potential adverse event because of the risk for infection.Upon further investigation, it was found that liquid does not flow back into the ucr from the water container unless multiple situations occur simultaneously.There are no reports of situations occurring for this complaint.In addition, a component analysis was performed on the water droplet traces in the tube of the ucr at a similar complaint.The results of this component analysis detected silica and others that appeared to be derived from tap water, but no component that appeared to be body fluids were detected.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|