Updated: b5, d10, h3, h6.Investigation summary: with all the available information, boston scientific concludes as no further information regarding this event is expected, our investigation is complete.This report will be updated should additional information be provided.Device technical analysis: the ams700 ipp cylinders were visually inspected and functionally tested.Both cylinders had wear at folds in cylinder body; no leak was found in cylinder 2.Cylinder 1 has leak in the proximal cylinder body that result of sharp instrument damage consistent with explant damage; hole was present.Due to this damage being consistent with explant it will be considered a secondary failure.The ams 700 momentary squeeze (ms) pump was visually inspected; no leaks were found.Product analysis concluded these activation issues could affect the functionality of the pump; therefore, product analysis confirmed pump malfunction.Based on this investigation, the investigation conclusion code of cause traced to component failure was chosen because the reported events could be traced to a component failure.The ams 700 flat reservoir was visually inspected and functionally tested; no leaks were found.The reservoir therefore performed within specification.Product analysis was unable to confirm the reported event.Based on the event details and the visual inspection, product analysis concluded there was not a device malfunction with the reservoir returned.Risk review: a review of the ams 700 hazard analysis was completed and confirmed that the event was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Labeling review: there is no objective evidence that the user did not properly handle or use the device according to device labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint.
|