The reported event could be confirmed, since the product was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure mode.The device inspection revealed the following: the received femoral nail was found to be bent and broken around the proximal region with an apparent crack.The breakage was caused by persisting higher load on the nail.One of the locking screws is broken whereas the other two are bent/worn and reason for the breakage and deformation is also the persisting higher load on them.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.The product certificate (work order: (b)(4)) of the heat number a8b82 for a screw was reviewed.It corresponds to the material defined on the drawing and to the internal material specification.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.The instructions for use instructs user that: ¿the correct selection of the fracture fixation appliance is extremely important.Failure to use the appropriate appliance for the fracture condition may accelerate clinical failure.Failure to use the proper component to maintain adequate blood supply and provide rigid fixation may result in loosening, bending, cracking or fracture of the device and/or bone.The correct implant size for a given patient can be determined by evaluating the patient¿s height, weight, functional demands and anatomy.Every implant must be used in the correct anatomic location, consistent with accepted standards of internal fixation.¿ formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert: ¿a reposition of the wedge fragment with a cerclage would have been necessary in this case.The load is too high on the small contacting cortex.Due to this no fracture healing occurred and with the persisting higher load the screw and later the nail failed.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.The failure was caused due to inadequate support given to the high load by surgeon and this reason is well supported by the medical opinion ¿a reposition of the wedge fragment with a cerclage would have been necessary in this case.The load is too high on the small contacting cortex.Due to this no fracture healing occurred and with the persisting higher load the screw and later the nail failed.¿ if any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
|