It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization pacemaker (crt-p) was explanted due to pacing inhibition.Additional information confirmed this was incorrect, this device was explanted due to normal battery depletion.This event is not a complaint as this allegation does not meet reportable complaint criteria.Based on further analysis, it was determined this device did not had the product performance issue of pacing inhibition.Evidence suggest this device was marked with pacing inhibition as an error.The related explanted lead of this procedure, was fractured and it had pacing inhibition.At the end, this device was explanted due to normal battery depletion (nbd), this allegation does not meet complaint criteria.
|