| Model Number |
OM-7000 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Information (3190)
|
| Date of Event |
09/27/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during surgery, when the surgeon was using the speedstitch gun for capsule closure in the hip and upon removing the device from the patient the shaft of the speedstitch device would pull off and remain in the cannula.The surgeon would just grab the piece sticking out of cannula and remove by hand.A backup device was available to complete the procedure with no significant delay or other complications.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during hip arthroscopy, when the surgeon was using the speedstitch gun for capsule closure and upon removing the device from the patient, the shaft of the speedstitch broke and disassembled from hand piece and remained in the cannula.The surgeon would just grab the piece sticking out of cannula and removed it by hand.A backup device was available to complete the procedure with no significant delay or other complications.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10 h3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was returned for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A review of the device history records for the device showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of the instructions for use found statements related to complaint event.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.Visual inspection of the device revealed that the barrel is completely detached from handle.The tube is bent.Functional evaluation revealed that the device was unable to be functionally tested due to the bent tube.The complaint was verified as the device's barrel was detached.Factors, which may have contributed to the reported complaint include: 1) excessive force.There were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|