|
Follow-up information was received on 20-oct-2020: the events radiesse might be in the vessel, nodule and bruise were added.It was confirmed that the patient was injected with radiesse(+)®, on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020, the day of the radiesse(+)® injection, the patient experienced the allergy to radiesse(+)®, further described as an anaphylactic type response.On 20-oct-2020, the day of this report, the reporter saw the patient and was concerned that radiesse(+)® might be in the vessel.The patient had a nodule and a bruise.The outcome of the events radiesse might be in the vessel, nodule and bruise was unknown.The outcome of the events allergy to radiesse/ anaphylactic type response and product preparation issue remained unchanged.Follow-up information was received on (b)(6) 2020: the event radiesse might be in the vessel was deleted.The event term allergy to radiesse / anaphylactic type response was amended to allergy to radiesse /anaphylactic type response / serum sickness from the bee stings, and the coding remained unchanged.The events swelling, product migration and off label use of device were added.The initial narrative was amended, the sentence a total of 1.5 ml of radiesse(+)® was diluted in 2.5 ml of normal saline (product preparation issue), was amended to a total of 1.5 ml of radiesse(+)® was diluted in 2.5 ml of normal saline (product preparation issue, off label use of device).The patients initials, date of birth and weight (76.7 kg) were provided.She was 60 years old at the time of the event.It was confirmed that she was injected with a total of 4ml of radiesse(+)®, into the oral commissures, on (b)(6) 2020.Radiesse(+)®was hyperdiluted.The patient was previously injected with hyaluronic acid and sculptra®.The patients medical history included a thyroid disorder.Concomitant medication included thyroid medication.On (b)(6) 2020, in the office, as corrective treatment, the patient received intravenous (reported as iv) methylpredinsone 40 mg, benadryl 25 mg and pepcid 20 mg.On (b)(6) 2020, later that night, the patient was stung again.She was seen in urgent care and placed on oral benadryl and oral pepcid.The patient did labs with a primary care physician and was diagnosed with serum sickness from the bee stings.In (b)(6) 2020, 2 weeks prior to this report the patient had fish and had another anaphylactic response due to the histamine in the fish.The patient was on a low histamine diet and was seeing an allergist.She had improvement in overall symptoms and reported that these episodes and the need for round the clock medications were decreasing.The patient had a small nodule that remained in the left lower lip (far left side), which was why the physician was concerned about vascular involvement, as the patient was not injected in the lip.At the time of this report, the physician did not believe that it was vascular involvement and believed that there was swelling and nodule formation secondary to product migration.At the time of this report, the patient was still being treated for histamine related issues by a primary care physician and an allergist.Due to provided information, the outcome of the event allergy to radiesse /anaphylactic type response / serum sickness from the bee stings was considered as resolving, and therefore changed from unknown.Due to provided information, the outcome of the event nodule was considered as not resolved, and therefore changed from unknown.The outcome for the events bruise and product preparation issue remained unchanged.The outcome for the events swelling and product migration was unknown.In the opinion of the reporter, treatment was necessary to prevent permanent damage and the events were not necessarily related to radiesse(+)® but it might have aggravated present medical condition (immune response to stings) and triggered a further histamine flare.In the opinion of the reporter, it was unknown if the events were permanent.
|