| Model Number |
G36013 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/24/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k182980.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
When the physician was attempting to deploy the reported stent, the sheath got separated from the hub though tortuosity in the patient's anatomy was not severe, another zib6-40-10.0-80 was used instead.The procedure was completed.The same wire guide was used for the reported device and the substitute device.Prefix zib6: was the device used percutaneously? (yes).Where on the patient was the percutaneous access site? bile duct/percutaneously.Details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? n/a.What was the target location for the stent? common bile duct.Was the device flushed through both flushing ports before the procedure, as per ifu? (no).Details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? unknown.Was the patient's anatomy tortuous or calcified? tortuousity.Was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide or delivery system to the target location? (yes).How did the physician deal with this resistance? was the target location calcified? (no).Did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? (yes).Are images of the device of procedure available? (no).Did the user pull the handle toward the hub during deployment and delivery system was not pushed during deployment? (yes).Was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? (no).Was post-dilation performed after the placement of the stent? (no).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k182980.The zib6-40-10.0-80 device of lot number c1737645 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Prior to distribution zib6-40-10.0-80 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for zib6-40-10.0-80 of lot number c1737645 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1737645.There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use.A definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to difficult patient anatomy.From the information provided it is known that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous and that the user encountered resistance when advancing the device to the target location.It is possible that the difficult patient anatomy contributed to the resistance encountered by the user during advancement and also resulted in the outer sheath separating from the handle during attempted deployment.The complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental follow-up report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation and an update to the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to updates made to the investigation conclusions on the 03-mar-2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k182980.Device evaluation: the zib6-40-10.0-80 device of lot number c1737645 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Images of the device recieved and these show that the outer sheath is separated from the handle.Prior to distribution zib6-40-10.0-80 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl a review of the manufacturing records for zib6-40-10.0-80 of lot number c1737645 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1737645.There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use (ifu0042-9).Image review ¿ n/a.Root cause review a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to difficult patient anatomy.From the information provided it is known that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous and that the user encountered resistance when advancing the device to the target location.It is possible that the difficult patient anatomy contributed to the resistance encountered by the user during advancement and also resulted in the outer sheath separating from the handle during attempted deployment.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|