| Model Number |
72202087S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Nonstandard Device (1420)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there was not autoclave stamp.No case reported; therefore, there was no patient involvement.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10 h3, h6: the reported device, intended for use in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A review of the drawing identified the autoclave marking.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
G4, h2, h3, h6.The reported device, intended for use in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection found distal tip and fiber damage.The device was confirmed to be missing the autoclave stamp.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat event.A review of the drawing identified the autoclave marking.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was determined to be manufacturing.A correction in the form of a complaint notification was sent to supplier quality engineering in an effort to mitigate future recurrence.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|