|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, pain and additional surgeries.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
|
Attorney alleges that on or about (b)(6) 2016, the patient underwent surgery for repair of an umbilical hernia.A sepramesh ip was implanted to repair the hernia defect.It is alleged that the patient was injured severely and permanently.The patient suffered pain, disability, hospitalizations and additional surgeries.It is also alleged that the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer physical pain, chronic pain, mental anguish, psychological stress, depression, has undergone and will likely require medical treatments and other forms of care.Attorney also alleges that the device was defective.
|