It was reported that the procedure was to treat an artery in the lower extremities.The emboshield nav6 embolic protection device (epd) and the barewire were placed and then the patient received atherectomy in the vessel.When the filter was attempted to be retrieved, it was noted that the tip of the barewire had detached and had moved to a side branch of the peroneal artery.A snare was used to retrieve the filter; however, the tip of the barewire remains in the patient.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other complaints.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported tip separation.It may be possible that interaction between the barewire and atherectomy device caused the tip to separate.It may also be possible that the tip of the barewire became lodged within a tight vessel resulting in separation during removal; however, this could not be confirmed.Embolism is listed in the emboshield nav6 embolic protection system electronic instructions for use as a known potential adverse event potentially associated with carotid stents and embolic protection systems.The reported embolism and foreign body in patient were related to circumstances procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|